[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200608054234-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 05:43:27 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>, virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/virtio: Support virtgpu exported resources
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 04:26:15PM +0900, David Stevens wrote:
> > > + if (virtio_has_feature(vgdev->vdev, VIRTIO_GPU_F_RESOURCE_UUID)) {
> > > + vgdev->has_resource_assign_uuid = true;
> > > + }
> >
> >
> > Just a question: this relies on DMA bufs so I assume it is
> > not really assumed to work when DMA API is bypassed, right?
> > Rather than worry what does it mean, how about just
> > disabling this feature without PLATFORM_DMA for now?
>
> By PLATFORM_DMA, do you mean CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER?
Sorry, no. I mean VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM which in the
future will be renamed to VIRTIO_F_PLATFORM_ACCESS.
> Virtio-gpu
> depends on DRM, which selects that feature. So I think DMA bufs should
> always be available when virtio-gpu is present.
>
> -David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists