[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <37252c65941e58473b1219ca9fab03d48f47e3e3.1591610330.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 12:06:32 +0200
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ALSA: pcm: fix snd_pcm_link() lockdep splat
Add and use snd_pcm_stream_lock_nested() in snd_pcm_link/unlink
implementation. The code is fine, but generates a lockdep complaint:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.7.1mq+ #381 Tainted: G O
--------------------------------------------
pulseaudio/4180 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888402d6f508 (&group->lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: snd_pcm_common_ioctl+0xda8/0xee0 [snd_pcm]
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8883f7a8cf18 (&group->lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: snd_pcm_common_ioctl+0xe4e/0xee0 [snd_pcm]
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&group->lock);
lock(&group->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
2 locks held by pulseaudio/4180:
#0: ffffffffa1a05190 (snd_pcm_link_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: snd_pcm_common_ioctl+0xca0/0xee0 [snd_pcm]
#1: ffff8883f7a8cf18 (&group->lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: snd_pcm_common_ioctl+0xe4e/0xee0 [snd_pcm]
[...]
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: f57f3df03a8e ("ALSA: pcm: More fine-grained PCM link locking")
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
---
sound/core/pcm_native.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_native.c b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
index 3ad399cb6f30..5b36881f7095 100644
--- a/sound/core/pcm_native.c
+++ b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
@@ -138,6 +138,16 @@ void snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq);
+static void snd_pcm_stream_lock_nested(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
+{
+ struct snd_pcm_group *group = &substream->self_group;
+
+ if (substream->pcm->nonatomic)
+ mutex_lock_nested(&group->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+ else
+ spin_lock_nested(&group->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+}
+
/**
* snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq - Unlock the PCM stream
* @substream: PCM substream
@@ -2200,7 +2210,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_link(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int fd)
snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(substream);
snd_pcm_group_lock_irq(target_group, nonatomic);
- snd_pcm_stream_lock(substream1);
+ snd_pcm_stream_lock_nested(substream1);
snd_pcm_group_assign(substream1, target_group);
refcount_inc(&target_group->refs);
snd_pcm_stream_unlock(substream1);
@@ -2216,7 +2226,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_link(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int fd)
static void relink_to_local(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
- snd_pcm_stream_lock(substream);
+ snd_pcm_stream_lock_nested(substream);
snd_pcm_group_assign(substream, &substream->self_group);
snd_pcm_stream_unlock(substream);
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists