| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:41:10 +0800
From: "Ning, Hongyu" <hongyu.ning@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>
Cc: Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vpillai@...italocean.com>,
Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@...italocean.com>,
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@...italocean.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Greg Kerr <kerrnel@...gle.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@...il.com>,
"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH updated v2] sched/fair: core wide cfs task priority
comparison
On 2020/5/14 21:02, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 08:34:57PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
>> With this said, I realized a workaround for the issue described above:
>> when the core went from 'compatible mode'(step 1-3) to 'incompatible
>> mode'(step 4), reset all root level sched entities' vruntime to be the
>> same as the core wide min_vruntime. After all, the core is transforming
>> from two runqueue mode to single runqueue mode... I think this can solve
>> the issue to some extent but I may miss other scenarios.
>
> A little something like so, this syncs min_vruntime when we switch to
> single queue mode. This is very much SMT2 only, I got my head in twist
> when thikning about more siblings, I'll have to try again later.
>
> This very much retains the horrible approximation of S we always do.
>
> Also, it is _completely_ untested...
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ static inline int __task_prio(struct tas
> /* real prio, less is less */
> static inline bool prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b)
> {
> -
> int pa = __task_prio(a), pb = __task_prio(b);
>
> if (-pa < -pb)
> @@ -114,19 +113,8 @@ static inline bool prio_less(struct task
> if (pa == -1) /* dl_prio() doesn't work because of stop_class above */
> return !dl_time_before(a->dl.deadline, b->dl.deadline);
>
> - if (pa == MAX_RT_PRIO + MAX_NICE) { /* fair */
> - u64 vruntime = b->se.vruntime;
> -
> - /*
> - * Normalize the vruntime if tasks are in different cpus.
> - */
> - if (task_cpu(a) != task_cpu(b)) {
> - vruntime -= task_cfs_rq(b)->min_vruntime;
> - vruntime += task_cfs_rq(a)->min_vruntime;
> - }
> -
> - return !((s64)(a->se.vruntime - vruntime) <= 0);
> - }
> + if (pa == MAX_RT_PRIO + MAX_NICE)
> + return cfs_prio_less(a, b);
>
> return false;
> }
> @@ -4293,10 +4281,11 @@ static struct task_struct *
> pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
> {
> struct task_struct *next, *max = NULL;
> + int old_active = 0, new_active = 0;
> const struct sched_class *class;
> const struct cpumask *smt_mask;
> - int i, j, cpu;
> bool need_sync = false;
> + int i, j, cpu;
>
> cpu = cpu_of(rq);
> if (cpu_is_offline(cpu))
> @@ -4349,10 +4338,14 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct tas
> rq_i->core_pick = NULL;
>
> if (rq_i->core_forceidle) {
> + // XXX is_idle_task(rq_i->curr) && rq_i->nr_running ??
> need_sync = true;
> rq_i->core_forceidle = false;
> }
>
> + if (!is_idle_task(rq_i->curr))
> + old_active++;
> +
> if (i != cpu)
> update_rq_clock(rq_i);
> }
> @@ -4463,8 +4456,12 @@ next_class:;
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!rq_i->core_pick);
>
> - if (is_idle_task(rq_i->core_pick) && rq_i->nr_running)
> - rq_i->core_forceidle = true;
> + if (is_idle_task(rq_i->core_pick)) {
> + if (rq_i->nr_running)
> + rq_i->core_forceidle = true;
> + } else {
> + new_active++;
> + }
>
> if (i == cpu)
> continue;
> @@ -4476,6 +4473,16 @@ next_class:;
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!cookie_match(next, rq_i->core_pick));
> }
>
> + /* XXX SMT2 only */
> + if (new_active == 1 && old_active > 1) {
> + /*
> + * We just dropped into single-rq mode, increment the sequence
> + * count to trigger the vruntime sync.
> + */
> + rq->core->core_sync_seq++;
> + }
> + rq->core->core_active = new_active;
> +
> done:
> set_next_task(rq, next);
> return next;
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -386,6 +386,12 @@ is_same_group(struct sched_entity *se, s
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static inline bool
> +is_same_tg(struct sched_entity *se, struct sched_entity *pse)
> +{
> + return se->cfs_rq->tg == pse->cfs_rq->tg;
> +}
> +
> static inline struct sched_entity *parent_entity(struct sched_entity *se)
> {
> return se->parent;
> @@ -394,8 +400,6 @@ static inline struct sched_entity *paren
> static void
> find_matching_se(struct sched_entity **se, struct sched_entity **pse)
> {
> - int se_depth, pse_depth;
> -
> /*
> * preemption test can be made between sibling entities who are in the
> * same cfs_rq i.e who have a common parent. Walk up the hierarchy of
> @@ -403,23 +407,16 @@ find_matching_se(struct sched_entity **s
> * parent.
> */
>
> - /* First walk up until both entities are at same depth */
> - se_depth = (*se)->depth;
> - pse_depth = (*pse)->depth;
> -
> - while (se_depth > pse_depth) {
> - se_depth--;
> - *se = parent_entity(*se);
> - }
> -
> - while (pse_depth > se_depth) {
> - pse_depth--;
> - *pse = parent_entity(*pse);
> - }
> + /* XXX we now have 3 of these loops, C stinks */
>
> while (!is_same_group(*se, *pse)) {
> - *se = parent_entity(*se);
> - *pse = parent_entity(*pse);
> + int se_depth = (*se)->depth;
> + int pse_depth = (*pse)->depth;
> +
> + if (se_depth <= pse_depth)
> + *pse = parent_entity(*pse);
> + if (se_depth >= pse_depth)
> + *se = parent_entity(*se);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -455,6 +452,12 @@ static inline struct sched_entity *paren
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static inline bool
> +is_same_tg(struct sched_entity *se, struct sched_entity *pse)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static inline void
> find_matching_se(struct sched_entity **se, struct sched_entity **pse)
> {
> @@ -462,6 +465,31 @@ find_matching_se(struct sched_entity **s
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
>
> +bool cfs_prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b)
> +{
> + struct sched_entity *se_a = &a->se, *se_b = &b->se;
> + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq_a, *cfa_rq_b;
> + u64 vruntime_a, vruntime_b;
> +
> + while (!is_same_tg(se_a, se_b)) {
> + int se_a_depth = se_a->depth;
> + int se_b_depth = se_b->depth;
> +
> + if (se_a_depth <= se_b_depth)
> + se_b = parent_entity(se_b);
> + if (se_a_depth >= se_b_depth)
> + se_a = parent_entity(se_a);
> + }
> +
> + cfs_rq_a = cfs_rq_of(se_a);
> + cfs_rq_b = cfs_rq_of(se_b);
> +
> + vruntime_a = se_a->vruntime - cfs_rq_a->core_vruntime;
> + vruntime_b = se_b->vruntime - cfs_rq_b->core_vruntime;
> +
> + return !((s64)(vruntime_a - vruntime_b) <= 0);
> +}
> +
> static __always_inline
> void account_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, u64 delta_exec);
>
> @@ -6891,6 +6919,18 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct
> set_last_buddy(se);
> }
>
> +static void core_sync_entity(struct rq *rq, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> +{
> + if (!sched_core_enabled())
> + return;
> +
> + if (rq->core->core_sync_seq == cfs_rq->core_sync_seq)
> + return;
> +
> + cfs_rq->core_sync_seq = rq->core->core_sync_seq;
> + cfs_rq->core_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> +}
> +
> static struct task_struct *pick_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
> {
> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
> @@ -6902,6 +6942,14 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_task_fai
> do {
> struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr;
>
> + /*
> + * Propagate the sync state down to whatever cfs_rq we need,
> + * the active cfs_rq's will have been done by
> + * set_next_task_fair(), the rest is inactive and will not have
> + * changed due to the current running task.
> + */
> + core_sync_entity(rq, cfs_rq);
> +
> se = pick_next_entity(cfs_rq, NULL);
>
> if (curr) {
> @@ -10825,7 +10873,8 @@ static void switched_to_fair(struct rq *
> }
> }
>
> -/* Account for a task changing its policy or group.
> +/*
> + * Account for a task changing its policy or group.
> *
> * This routine is mostly called to set cfs_rq->curr field when a task
> * migrates between groups/classes.
> @@ -10847,6 +10896,9 @@ static void set_next_task_fair(struct rq
> for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
>
> + /* snapshot vruntime before using it */
> + core_sync_entity(rq, cfs_rq);
> +
> set_next_entity(cfs_rq, se);
> /* ensure bandwidth has been allocated on our new cfs_rq */
> account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, 0);
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -503,6 +503,10 @@ struct cfs_rq {
> unsigned int h_nr_running; /* SCHED_{NORMAL,BATCH,IDLE} */
> unsigned int idle_h_nr_running; /* SCHED_IDLE */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> + unsigned int core_sync_seq;
> + u64 core_vruntime;
> +#endif
> u64 exec_clock;
> u64 min_vruntime;
> #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> @@ -1035,12 +1039,15 @@ struct rq {
> unsigned int core_enabled;
> unsigned int core_sched_seq;
> struct rb_root core_tree;
> - bool core_forceidle;
> + unsigned int core_forceidle;
>
> /* shared state */
> unsigned int core_task_seq;
> unsigned int core_pick_seq;
> unsigned long core_cookie;
> + unsigned int core_sync_seq;
> + unsigned int core_active;
> +
> #endif
> };
>
> @@ -2592,6 +2599,8 @@ static inline bool sched_energy_enabled(
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL && CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL */
>
> +extern bool cfs_prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMBARRIER
> /*
> * The scheduler provides memory barriers required by membarrier between:
>
here is a quick test update based on Peter's fairness patch above:
- Kernel under test:
A: Core scheduling v5 community base + Peter's fairness patch (by reverting Aaron's fairness patch)
https://github.com/digitalocean/linux-coresched/tree/coresched/v5-v5.5.y + Peter's patch above
B: Core scheduling v5 community base (with Aaron's fairness patchset)
https://github.com/digitalocean/linux-coresched/tree/coresched/v5-v5.5.y (with Aaron's fairness patch）
- Test results briefing:
OVERALL PERFORMANCE ARE THE SAME FOR FOLLOWING 3 TEST SETS, BETWEEN 2 KERNEL TEST BUILDS
- Test set based on sysbench 1.1.0-bd4b418:
1: sysbench cpu in cgroup cpu 0 + sysbench cpu in cgroup cpu 1 (192 workload tasks for each cgroup)
2: sysbench mysql in cgroup mysql 0 + sysbench mysql in cgroup mysql 1 (192 workload tasks for each cgroup)
3: sysbench cpu in cgroup cpu 0 + sysbench mysql in cgroup mysql 0 (192 workload tasks for each cgroup)
- Test environment:
Intel Xeon Server platform
CPU(s): 192
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-191
Thread(s) per core: 2
Core(s) per socket: 48
Socket(s): 2
NUMA node(s): 4
- Test results:
Note:
1: test results in following tables are Tput normalized to default baseline
2: test setting in following tables:
2.1: default -> core scheduling disabled
2.2: coresched -> core scheduling enabled
3. default test results are reused between 2 kernel test builds
Test set 1:
+----------------------------------+-------+-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
| setting | *** | default | default | coresched | coresched | ** | default | default | coresched | coresched |
+==================================+=======+===========+=============+=============+===============+======+=============+=============+===============+===============+
| cgroups | *** | cg cpu 0 | cg cpu 0 | cg cpu 0 | cg cpu 0 | ** | cg cpu 1 | cg cpu 1 | cg cpu 1 | cg cpu 1 |
+----------------------------------+-------+-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
| sysbench workload | *** | cpu | cpu | cpu | cpu | ** | cpu | cpu | cpu | cpu |
+----------------------------------+-------+-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
| record item | *** | Tput_avg | Tput_stdev% | Tput_avg | Tput_stdev% | ** | Tput_avg | Tput_stdev% | Tput_avg | Tput_stdev% |
+----------------------------------+-------+-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
| Kernel_A(Peter's fairness patch) | *** | | | 0.96 | 3.45% | ** | | | 1.03 | 3.60% |
+----------------------------------+-------+ 1 + 1.14% +-------------+---------------+------+ 1 + 1.20% +---------------+---------------+
| Kernel_B(Aaron's fairness patch) | *** | | | 0.98 | 1.75% | ** | | | 1.01 | 1.83% |
+----------------------------------+-------+-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
Test set 2:
+----------------------------------+-------+------------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
| setting | *** | default | default | coresched | coresched | ** | default | default | coresched | coresched |
+==================================+=======+============+=============+=============+===============+======+=============+=============+===============+===============+
| cgroups | *** | cg mysql 0 | cg mysql 0 | cg mysql 0 | cg mysql 0 | ** | cg mysql 1 | cg mysql 1 | cg mysql 1 | cg mysql 1 |
+----------------------------------+-------+------------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
| sysbench workload | *** | mysql | mysql | mysql | mysql | ** | mysql | mysql | mysql | mysql |
+----------------------------------+-------+------------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
| record item | *** | Tput_avg | Tput_stdev% | Tput_avg | Tput_stdev% | ** | Tput_avg | Tput_stdev% | Tput_avg | Tput_stdev% |
+----------------------------------+-------+------------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
| Kernel_A(Peter's fairness patch) | *** | | | 0.98 | 2.00% | ** | | | 0.98 | 1.98% |
+----------------------------------+-------+ 1 + 1.85% +-------------+---------------+------+ 1 + 1.84% +---------------+---------------+
| Kernel_B(Aaron's fairness patch) | *** | | | 1.01 | 1.61% | ** | | | 1.01 | 1.59% |
+----------------------------------+-------+------------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
Test set 3:
+----------------------------------+-------+-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
| setting | *** | default | default | coresched | coresched | ** | default | default | coresched | coresched |
+==================================+=======+===========+=============+=============+===============+======+=============+=============+===============+===============+
| cgroups | *** | cg cpu | cg cpu | cg cpu | cg cpu | ** | cg mysql | cg mysql | cg mysql | cg mysql |
+----------------------------------+-------+-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
| sysbench workload | *** | cpu | cpu | cpu | cpu | ** | mysql | mysql | mysql | mysql |
+----------------------------------+-------+-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
| record item | *** | Tput_avg | Tput_stdev% | Tput_avg | Tput_stdev% | ** | Tput_avg | Tput_stdev% | Tput_avg | Tput_stdev% |
+----------------------------------+-------+-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
| Kernel_A(Peter's fairness patch) | *** | | | 1.01 | 4.67% | ** | | | 0.84 | 25.89% |
+----------------------------------+-------+ 1 + 1.56% +-------------+---------------+------+ 1 + 3.17% +---------------+---------------+
| Kernel_B(Aaron's fairness patch) | *** | | | 0.99 | 4.17% | ** | | | 0.89 | 16.44% |
+----------------------------------+-------+-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------+---------------+---------------+
Powered by blists - more mailing lists