lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 8 Jun 2020 15:34:58 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
Cc:     mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
        vkoul@...nel.org, will.deacon@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        festevam@...il.com, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
        martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-imx@....com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 RESEND 01/13] spi: imx: add dma_sync_sg_for_device
 after fallback from dma

On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 07:21:05AM +0800, Robin Gong wrote:
> In case dma transfer failed and fallback to pio, tx_buf/rx_buf need to be
> taken care cache since they have already been maintained by spi.c

Is this needed as part of this series?  This looks like an independent
fix and it seems better to get this in independently. 

> Fixes: bcd8e7761ec9("spi: imx: fallback to PIO if dma setup failure")
> Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
> Reported-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/5d246dd81607bb6e5cb9af86ad4e53f7a7a99c50.camel@ew.tq-group.com/

The Link is usually to the patch on the list.

> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> @@ -1456,6 +1456,13 @@ static int spi_imx_pio_transfer(struct spi_device *spi,
>  		return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (transfer->rx_sg.sgl) {
> +		struct device *rx_dev = spi->controller->dma_rx->device->dev;
> +
> +		dma_sync_sg_for_device(rx_dev, transfer->rx_sg.sgl,
> +				       transfer->rx_sg.nents, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +	}
> +
>  	return transfer->len;
>  }

This is confusing - why are we DMA mapping to the device after doing a
PIO transfer?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ