[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200608103709.39afa15f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 10:37:09 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: Divya Indi <divya.indi@...cle.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aruna Ramakrishna <aruna.ramakrishna@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sample-trace-array: Fix sleeping function called from
invalid context
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 07:54:37 +0000
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com> wrote:
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:935
> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 0, name: swapper/5
> 1 lock held by swapper/5/0:
> #0: ffff80001002bd90 (samples/ftrace/sample-trace-array.c:38){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0x8/0x3e0
> CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Not tainted 5.7.0+ #8
> Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
> Call trace:
> dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a0
> show_stack+0x20/0x30
> dump_stack+0xe4/0x150
> ___might_sleep+0x160/0x200
> __might_sleep+0x58/0x90
> __mutex_lock+0x64/0x948
> mutex_lock_nested+0x3c/0x58
> __ftrace_set_clr_event+0x44/0x88
> trace_array_set_clr_event+0x24/0x38
> mytimer_handler+0x34/0x40 [sample_trace_array]
>
> mutex_lock() will be called in interrupt context, using workqueueu to fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
>
Divya,
Can you give a Reviewed-by for this?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists