linux-kernel - Re: blk-softirq vs smp_call_function_single

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200608164254.GA2431@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:42:54 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, frederic@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: blk-softirq vs smp_call_function_single_async()

On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 06:40:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> There isn't one, it was meant to be used with static allocations.
> 
> Frederic proposed changing all these to irq_work, and I think I'll go do
> that. First dinner though.

The irq_work API looks reasonable.  What are the tradeoffs for
smp_call_single_async vs irq_work?