[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200608184507.GC4106@dell>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 19:45:07 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] mfd: mfd-core: match device tree node against
reg property
On Mon, 08 Jun 2020, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2020-06-08 16:24, schrieb Lee Jones:
> > On Mon, 25 May 2020, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > Am 2020-05-15 12:28, schrieb Lee Jones:
> > > > On Thu, 30 Apr 2020, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Lee,
> > > > >
> > > > > Am 2020-04-23 19:45, schrieb Michael Walle:
> > > > > > There might be multiple children with the device tree compatible, for
> > > > > > example if a MFD has multiple instances of the same function. In this
> > > > > > case only the first is matched and the other children get a wrong
> > > > > > of_node reference.
> > > > > > Add a new option to match also against the unit address of the child
> > > > > > node. Additonally, a new helper OF_MFD_CELL_REG is added.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/core.h b/include/linux/mfd/core.h
> > > > > > index d01d1299e49d..c2c0ad6b14f3 100644
> > > > > > --- a/include/linux/mfd/core.h
> > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/core.h
> > > > > > @@ -13,8 +13,11 @@
> > > > > > #include <linux/plataorm_device.h>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #define MFD_RES_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof(struct resource))
> > > > > > +#define MFD_OF_REG_VALID BIT(31)
> > > >
> > > > What about 64bit platforms?
> > >
> > > The idea was to have this as a logical number. I.e. for now you may
> > > only
> > > have one subdevice per unique compatible string. In fact, if you
> > > have a
> > > look at the ab8500.c, there are multiple "stericsson,ab8500-pwm"
> > > subdevices. But there is only one DT node for all three of it. I guess
> > > this works as long as you don't use phandles to reference the pwm node
> > > in the device tree. Or you don't want to use device tree properties
> > > per subdevice (for example the "timeout-sec" of a watchdog device).
> >
> > This is not a good example, as the "stericsson,ab8500-pwm" is
> > legitimate. Here we are registering 3 potential devices, but only
> > instantiating 1 of them.
>
> Mh?
>
> static const struct mfd_cell ab8500_devs[] = {
> ..
> OF_MFD_CELL("ab8500-pwm",
> NULL, NULL, 0, 1, "stericsson,ab8500-pwm"),
> OF_MFD_CELL("ab8500-pwm",
> NULL, NULL, 0, 2, "stericsson,ab8500-pwm"),
> OF_MFD_CELL("ab8500-pwm",
> NULL, NULL, 0, 3, "stericsson,ab8500-pwm"),
> ..
> }
>
> And in pwm-ab8500.c there are three offsets based on the pdev->id.
>
> Am I missing something here?
Scrap what I said above.
For some reason I had of_platform_populate() in my head.
This will register and enumerate 3 devices.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists