lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a71c2b68-fc70-a7bf-1d1c-500459639dae@nvidia.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jun 2020 12:22:05 -0700
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC:     Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>,
        "open list:ANDROID DRIVERS" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        Bharath Vedartham <linux.bhar@...il.com>,
        <harshjain32@...il.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Simon Sandström <simon@...anor.nu>,
        <jane.pnx9@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: kpc2000: kpc_dma: Convert get_user_pages() -->
 pin_user_pages()

On 2020-06-08 12:16, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 12:05:57PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
>> On 2020-06-08 12:01, Souptick Joarder wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 7:15 AM John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2020-05-31 10:51, Souptick Joarder wrote:
>>>>> In 2019, we introduced pin_user_pages*() and now we are converting
>>>>> get_user_pages*() to the new API as appropriate. [1] & [2] could
>>>>> be referred for more information.
>>>>>
>>>>> When pin_user_pages() returns numbers of partially mapped pages,
>>>>> those pages were not unpinned as part of error handling. Fixed
>>>>> it as part of this patch.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Souptick,
>>>>
>>>> btw, Bharath (+cc) attempted to do the "put" side of this, last year.
>>>> That got as far as a v4 patch [1], and then I asked him to let me put
>>>> it into my tree. But then it didn't directly apply anymore after the
>>>> whole design moved to pin+unpin, and so here we are now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If Bharath is still doing kernel work, you might offer him a Co-Developed-by:
>>>> tag (see https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html).
>>>
>>> Sure, will add him as *Co-Developed-by*
>>>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, but it's best to wait and see if he responds, before adding that tag, because
>> it also required a Signed-off-by from him.
> 
> Souptick is porting patches from your tree?  It's not clear to me how
> Bharath actually helped author this patch.


What happened is that Bharath wrote patches very similar to these, last year.
And we spent some time on review and figuring out pre-existing issues in the code.

Anyway, I suspect that he's not actually involved anymore, so I probably shouldn't
have done any more than to just put him on Cc. Sorry for any confusion I created
here.

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ