[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200608192524.GF4106@dell>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 20:25:24 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] mfd: core: Propagate software node group to the
sub devices
On Mon, 08 Jun 2020, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
>
> When ever device properties are supplied for a sub device, a software node
> (fwnode) is actually created and then associated with that device. By allowing
> the drivers to supply the complete software node group instead of just the
> properties in it, the drivers can take advantage of the other features the
> software nodes have on top of supplying the device properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/mfd/core.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
I'm not sure a change to the API is justified presently (same does go
for 'properties' really, but as it was only a couple of lines, it
didn't seem too intrusive).
My recommendation is to handle this in-house (i.e. locally in-driver)
for now. When (if) more users adopt the practice, then we should
consider to draw down on line numbers and repetition and make it part
of the API.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists