linux-kernel - Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] media: vsp1: Fix runtime PM imbalance in vsp1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <769e1fbf.f668c.17291fd9673.Coremail.dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jun 2020 11:33:34 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From:   dinghao.liu@....edu.cn
To:     "Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     kjlu@....edu,
        "Kieran Bingham" <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] media: vsp1: Fix runtime PM imbalance in
 vsp1_probe


> 
> The vsp1_probe() function has a struct vsp1_device whose dev field is
> populated by the time it needs to call pm_runtime_get_sync() and
> pm_runtime_get_put(), so I think you can use vsp1_device_get() and
> vsp1_device_put() as drop-in replacements without changing the
> parameters to these two functions.
> 

It's clear to me, thanks!

Regards,
Dinghao