lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e88dd76-5b75-c326-6f89-42a69bfe1ede@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jun 2020 13:13:36 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, wahrenst@....net,
        robh@...nel.org, mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com,
        Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tim.gover@...pberrypi.org,
        helgaas@...nel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] reset: Add Raspberry Pi 4 firmware USB reset
 controller



On 6/8/2020 12:26 PM, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> The Raspberry Pi 4 gets its USB functionality from VL805, a PCIe chip
> that implements the xHCI. After a PCI fundamental reset, VL805's
> firmware may either be loaded directly from an EEPROM or, if not
> present, by the SoC's co-processor, VideoCore. RPi4's VideoCore OS
> contains both the non public firmware load logic and the VL805 firmware
> blob.
> 
> We control this trough a reset controller device that's able to trigger
> the aforementioned process when relevant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
> ---

[snip]

> +static int rpi_usb_reset_reset(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> +				unsigned long id)
> +{
> +	struct rpi_usb_reset *priv = to_rpi_usb(rcdev);
> +	u32 dev_addr;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The pci device address is expected like this:
> +	 *
> +	 * PCI_BUS << 20 | PCI_SLOT << 15 | PCI_FUNC << 12
> +	 *
> +	 * But since rpi's PCIe setup is hardwired, we know the address in
> +	 * advance.
> +	 */
> +	dev_addr = 0x100000;

You could encode the device address as part of the reset identifier,
such that if we ever have more devices to reset, then we only need to
define new identifiers for them, and internally within your reset
controller provide you can resolve that reset identifier 0 is PCI_BUS <<
20 | PCI_SLOT << 15 | PCI_FUN << 12 for instance.

This would make your reset controller define a "#reset-cells" property
to 1 now, such that no further DT ABI breakage would occur if you were
to extend it later on.
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ