[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200609134309.GG22623@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 15:43:09 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: js1304@...il.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@....com,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] mm/hugetlb: unify hugetlb migration callback
function
On Wed 27-05-20 15:44:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
[...]
> -/* page migration callback function */
> struct page *alloc_huge_page_nodemask(struct hstate *h,
> struct alloc_control *ac)
> {
> ac->gfp_mask |= htlb_alloc_mask(h);
> + if (ac->nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> + ac->gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_THISNODE;
Is this really needed? alloc_huge_page_node is currently only called
from numa migration code and the target node should be always defined.
>
> spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> if (h->free_huge_pages - h->resv_huge_pages > 0) {
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 3b6b551..e705efd 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -1073,9 +1073,10 @@ struct page *alloc_new_node_page(struct page *page, unsigned long node)
> struct alloc_control ac = {
> .nid = node,
> .nmask = NULL,
> + .gfp_mask = __GFP_THISNODE,
> };
>
> - return alloc_huge_page_node(h, &ac);
> + return alloc_huge_page_nodemask(h, &ac);
> } else if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
> struct page *thp;
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists