[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5c0dae88-e172-3ba6-f86c-d1a6238bb4c4@web.de>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 16:16:10 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] coccinelle: api: extend memdup_user transformation
with GFP_USER
…
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/memdup_user.cocci
> @@ -20,7 +20,9 @@ expression from,to,size;
…
> +- to = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\)
> + (size,\(GFP_KERNEL\|GFP_USER\|
> + \(GFP_KERNEL\|GFP_USER\)|__GFP_NOWARN\));
I got the impression that this SmPL code needs another correction also
according to the proposed SmPL disjunction.
+-to = \( kmalloc \| kzalloc \) (size, \( GFP_KERNEL \| GFP_USER \) \( | __GFP_NOWARN \| \) );
Would you like to express by any other approach that a specific flag
is an optional source code transformation parameter?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists