[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200609144201.GK4583@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 15:42:01 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
david.m.ertman@...el.com, shiraz.saleem@...el.com,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] mfd: Add support for Kontron sl28cpld
management controller
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 04:38:31PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> mfd-device@10 {
> compatible = "simple-regmap", "simple-mfd";
> reg = <10>;
> regmap,reg-bits = <8>;
> regmap,val-bits = <8>;
> sub-device@0 {
> compatible = "vendor,sub-device0";
> reg = <0>;
> };
A DT binding like this is not a good idea, encoding the details of the
register map into the DT binding makes it an ABI which is begging for
trouble. I'd also suggest that any device using a generic driver like
this should have a specific compatible string for the device so we can
go back and add quirks later if we need them.
> ...
> };
>
> Or if you just want the regmap:
>
> &soc {
> regmap: regmap@...0000 {
> compatible = "simple-regmap";
> reg = <0xfff0000>;
> regmap,reg-bits = <16>;
> regmap,val-bits = <32>;
> };
>
> enet-which-needs-syscon-too@...0000 {
> vendor,ctrl-regmap = <®map>;
> };
> };
>
> Similar to the current syscon (which is MMIO only..).
>
> -michael
>
> >
> > I can't think of any reasons why not, off the top of my head.
> >
> > Does Regmap only deal with shared accesses from multiple devices
> > accessing a single register map, or can it also handle multiple
> > devices communicating over a single I2C channel?
> >
> > One for Mark perhaps.
> >
> > > > The issues I wish to resolve using 'simple-mfd' are when sub-devices
> > > > register maps overlap and intertwine.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > > > > What do these bits configure?
> > > > >
> > > > > - hardware strappings which have to be there before the board powers
> > > > > up,
> > > > > like clocking mode for different SerDes settings
> > > > > - "keep-in-reset" bits for onboard peripherals if you want to save
> > > > > power
> > > > > - disable watchdog bits (there is a watchdog which is active right
> > > > > from
> > > > > the start and supervises the bootloader start and switches to
> > > > > failsafe
> > > > > mode if it wasn't successfully started)
> > > > > - special boot modes, like eMMC, etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Think of it as a 16bit configuration word.
> > > >
> > > > And you wish for users to be able to view these at run-time?
> > >
> > > And esp. change them.
> > >
> > > > Can they adapt any of them on-the-fly or will the be RO?
> > >
> > > They are R/W but only will only affect the board behavior after a
> > > reset.
> >
> > I see. Makes sense. This is board controller territory. Perhaps
> > suitable for inclusion into drivers/soc or drivers/platform.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists