[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200609173143.GN4583@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 18:31:43 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
robh@...nel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: tas2562: Add firmware support for
tas2563
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 12:28:40PM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Add a property called firmware-name that will be the name of the
> firmware that will reside in the file system or built into the kernel.
Why not just use a standard name for the firmware? If the firmwares
vary per-board then building it using the machine compatible (or DMI
info) could handle that, with a fallback to a standard name for a
default setup.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists