linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] IMA: Add audit log for failure conditions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1591724039.5567.33.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 09 Jun 2020 13:33:59 -0400
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
        Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc:     Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] IMA: Add audit log for failure conditions

Hi Richard,

On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 13:15 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 2020-06-09 10:00, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:

> If it is added, it should be appended to the end of the record since it
> is an existing record format, then in the case of res=1, errno= should
> still be present (not swing in and out) and just contain zero.  (Or
> another value if there is a non-fatal warning?)

Thank you for the clarification.

Mimi