[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM0PR0402MB3905BE3E0047941D5880ABA6F5820@AM0PR0402MB3905.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 22:49:01 +0000
From: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
"l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] soc: imx8m: Correct i.MX8MP UID fuse offset
Hi, Luliana
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] soc: imx8m: Correct i.MX8MP UID fuse offset
>
> Hi, Luliana
>
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: imx8m: Correct i.MX8MP UID fuse offset
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/9/2020 4:15 PM, Anson Huang wrote:
> > > Correct i.MX8MP UID fuse offset according to fuse map:
> > >
> > > UID_LOW: 0x420
> > > UID_HIGH: 0x430
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> >
> > If this patch corrects the imx8mp UID shouldn't have a Fixes tag?
>
> I thought about this, but I was confused that this file name is changed by
> commit fc40200ebf82 ("soc: imx: increase build coverage for imx8m soc
> driver"), so if to add fix tag, should I add the tag to point to first patch of
> drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8m.c, or the original commit of supporting 8MP UID in
> drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8.c which is no long there.
I think it should be commit fc40200ebf82 ("soc: imx: increase build coverage for imx8m soc
driver"), will send a V2 patch.
Thanks,
Anson
Powered by blists - more mailing lists