linux-kernel - RE: [RFC PATCH 5/5] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1402433372.121591664283543.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2>
Date:   Tue, 09 Jun 2020 09:53:23 +0900
From:   Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
To:     Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
        Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
        ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
        "tomas.winkler@...el.com" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
CC:     "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@...sung.com>,
        Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>,
        yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
        Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
        Adel Choi <adel.choi@...sung.com>,
        BoRam Shin <boram.shin@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 5/5] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached
 sub-region

> > +static bool ufshpb_test_ppn_dirty(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb, int rgn_idx,
> > +                                  int srgn_idx, int srgn_offset, int cnt)

> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < bit_len; i++) {
> > +               if (test_bit(srgn_offset + i, srgn->mctx->ppn_dirty))
> Maybe use a mask or hweight instead of testing bit by bit?
There is no problem in this HPB vesion because it only supports 4KB sized read IO.
However, this code is not as efficient as you pointed out. So I will change this in HPB version 2.0.

> > +static void
> > +ufshpb_set_hpb_read_to_upiu(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb, struct ufshcd_lrb
> > *lrbp,
> > +                                 u32 lpn, u64 ppn,  unsigned int transfer_len)
> > +{
> > +       unsigned char *cdb = lrbp->ucd_req_ptr->sc.cdb;
> > +
> > +       cdb[0] = UFSHPB_READ;
> > +
> > +       put_unaligned_be32(lpn, &cdb[2]);
> Is this needed? The lba is already occupying bytes 2..5
The needless code will be deleted on next patch.

Thanks,
Daejun