[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <196ae774-7237-94b7-3b50-399571f255d8@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:09:34 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: fix calls to is_intercept
On 09/06/20 09:30, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> And if I understand correctly that bug didn't affect anything I tested
> because your recent patches started to avoid the usage of the interrupt
> window unless L1 clears the usage of the interrupt intercept which is
> rare.
>
> Looks correct to me, and I guess this could have being avoided have C
> enforced the enumeration types.
Yes, another possibility could be to unify SVM_EXIT_* and INTERCEPT_*
enums. For example we could have something like
union {
u32 all[5];
struct {
u32 cr, dr, exceptions;
};
} intercept;
and use __set/clear/test_bit_le() in set/clr/is_intercept.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists