linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] block: Fix use-after-free in blkdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200609091244.GB529192@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Jun 2020 11:12:44 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        hulkci@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] block: Fix use-after-free in blkdev_get()

On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 11:48:24AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Looks good,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> 
> How does this feedback fit to remaining typos in the change description?
> Do you care for any further improvements of the commit message
> besides the discussed tag “Fixes”?

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot