linux-kernel - Re: [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:09:48 +0530
From:   Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...il.com>
To:     Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
Cc:     "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        Joao Lima <Joao.Lima@...opsys.com>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version

Hi Jose

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com> wrote:
>
> From: Bean Huo (beanhuo) <beanhuo@...ron.com>
> Date: Apr/29/2020, 13:59:08 (UTC+00:00)
> > > Probably. I think we can leave them or change the dev_err to a dev_warn.
> > > This way we have logs in case someone is using a non-supported version.
> > >
> > > What do you think ?
> > >
> > Hi, Jose
> > Seems after your patch, all of current released UFS control versions will be supported except the
> > version suffix is non-zero. Right?
>
> I think we cover all versions with this patch.
>
Are you still on this?

> ---
> Thanks,
> Jose Miguel Abreu



-- 
Regards,
Alim