[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da087813-7be4-0e3c-d93c-a29d6933b69d@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:06:58 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] KVM: x86: Switch KVM guest to using interrupts
for page ready APF delivery
On 10/06/20 22:51, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> KVM now supports using interrupt for 'page ready' APF event delivery and
>> legacy mechanism was deprecated. Switch KVM guests to the new one.
> Hi Vitaly,
>
> I see we have all this code in guest which tries to take care of
> cases where PAGE_READY can be delivered before PAGE_NOT_PRESENT. In
> this new schedume of things, can it still happen. We are using
> an exception to deliver PAGE_NOT_PRESENT while using interrupt to
> deliver PAGE_READY.
>
> If re-ordeing is not possible, then it will be good to get rid of
> that extra complexity in guest.
It is perhaps less likely but still possible, because the interrupt
might be delivered to another CPU and race against the exception.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists