linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: eesox: Fix different dev_id between 'request_irq()' and 'free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:36:16 +0200
From:   Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        jejb@...ux.ibm.com, linux@...linux.org.uk
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: eesox: Fix different dev_id between 'request_irq()'
 and 'free_irq()'

Le 10/06/2020 à 04:41, Martin K. Petersen a écrit :
> On Sat, 30 May 2020 09:34:18 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>
>> The dev_id used in 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()' should match.
>> So use 'host' in both cases.
> Applied to 5.8/scsi-queue, thanks!
>
> [1/1] scsi: eesox: Fix different dev_id between request_irq() and free_irq()
>        https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/3bab76807d95
>
Please revert, the patch is bogus, as spotted by Russell King - ARM 
Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>.
See [1].

I'll try to send the correct fix by this week-end.

CJ

[1]: https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=159083184215730&w=4