[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83098c98-453c-16d0-ef1a-d4602de3952c@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:31:20 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: dylan-meiners <spacct.spacct@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: Fixed typo.
On 09.06.20 20:51, dylan-meiners wrote:
> Changed "optizimation" to "optimization".
>
> Signed-off-by: dylan-meiners <spacct.spacct@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index b6d84326bdf2..8ac7bf9c3c43 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static int __remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page,
> * order to detect refaults, thus thrashing, later on.
> *
> * But don't store shadows in an address space that is
> - * already exiting. This is not just an optizimation,
> + * already exiting. This is not just an optimization,
> * inode reclaim needs to empty out the radix tree or
> * the nodes are lost. Don't plant shadows behind its
> * back.
>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists