lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200610084157.GD1151302@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:41:57 +0300
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] x86/mm: Fix boot with some memory above MAXMEM

On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 03:54:23PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> A 5-level paging capable machine can have memory above 46-bit in the
> physical address space. This memory is only addressable in the 5-level
> paging mode: we don't have enough virtual address space to create direct
> mapping for such memory in the 4-level paging mode.
> 
> Currently, we fail boot completely: NULL pointer dereference in
> subsection_map_init().
> 
> Skip creating a memblock for such memory instead and notify user that
> some memory is not addressable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.14

Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> index c5399e80c59c..c10bab121916 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/firmware-map.h>
>  #include <linux/sort.h>
>  #include <linux/memory_hotplug.h>
> +#include <linux/string_helpers.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/e820/api.h>
>  #include <asm/setup.h>
> @@ -1280,8 +1281,8 @@ void __init e820__memory_setup(void)
>  
>  void __init e820__memblock_setup(void)
>  {
> +	u64 size, end, not_addressable = 0;
>  	int i;
> -	u64 end;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The bootstrap memblock region count maximum is 128 entries
> @@ -1307,7 +1308,26 @@ void __init e820__memblock_setup(void)
>  		if (entry->type != E820_TYPE_RAM && entry->type != E820_TYPE_RESERVED_KERN)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		memblock_add(entry->addr, entry->size);
> +		if (entry->addr >= MAXMEM) {
> +			not_addressable += entry->size;
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		end = min_t(u64, end, MAXMEM - 1);
> +		size = end - entry->addr;
> +		not_addressable += entry->size - size;
> +		memblock_add(entry->addr, size);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (not_addressable) {
> +		char tmp[10];
> +
> +		string_get_size(not_addressable, 1, STRING_UNITS_2, tmp, sizeof(tmp));
> +		pr_err("%s of physical memory is not addressable in the %s paging mode\n",
> +		       tmp, pgtable_l5_enabled() ? "5-level" : "4-level");
> +
> +		if (!pgtable_l5_enabled())
> +			pr_err("Consider enabling 5-level paging\n");
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Throw away partial pages: */
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ