[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <552e1ae9-8b28-a462-5ee8-3e5bd6821c90@nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:43:17 +0300
From: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
"l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] soc: imx8m: Correct i.MX8MP UID fuse offset
On 6/10/2020 10:57 AM, Anson Huang wrote:
>
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH V2] soc: imx8m: Correct i.MX8MP UID fuse offset
>>
>>> From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 6:42 AM
>>>
>>> Correct i.MX8MP UID fuse offset according to fuse map:
>>>
>>> UID_LOW: 0x420
>>> UID_HIGH: 0x430
>>>
>>> Fixes: fc40200ebf82 ("soc: imx: increase build coverage for imx8m soc
>>> driver")
>>
>> AFAIK "Fixes:" should point to the original patch which introduced the issue.
>> Not the one changing file name.
>
> But the patch can NOT be applied to the kernel version with original file, how to
> fix it?
>
I believe you can add two "Fixes:" with the two commits: the one
introducing the issue and the one changing the file name.
Iulia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists