[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <56B2561B-33AC-40AB-9991-97EC72F9613F@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:43:42 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-mem: silence a static checker warning
> Am 10.06.2020 um 10:59 schrieb Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>:
>
> Smatch complains that "rc" can be uninitialized if we hit the "break;"
> statement on the first iteration through the loop. I suspect that this
> can't happen in real life, but returning a zero literal is cleaner and
> silence the static checker warning.
>
Right, it‘s impossible in real life. Thanks!
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
> index f658fe9149beb..893ef18060a02 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
> @@ -1192,7 +1192,7 @@ static int virtio_mem_mb_plug_any_sb(struct virtio_mem *vm, unsigned long mb_id,
> VIRTIO_MEM_MB_STATE_OFFLINE);
> }
>
> - return rc;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists