[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=X-da3V0OC-Bzd2rmkNuZ_bVpH_n7Sp5P_hSGXD4ryyBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:02:04 +0200
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: silence a KASAN false positive
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 7:55 AM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 7:22 AM Qian Cai <cai@....pw> wrote:
> >
> > kernel_init_free_pages() will use memset() on s390 to clear all pages
> > from kmalloc_order() which will override KASAN redzones because a
> > redzone was setup from the end of the allocation size to the end of the
> > last page. Silence it by not reporting it there. An example of the
> > report is,
>
> Interesting. The reason why we did not hit it on x86_64 is because
> clear_page is implemented in asm (arch/x86/lib/clear_page_64.S) and
> thus is not instrumented. Arm64 probably does the same. However, on
> s390 clear_page is defined to memset.
Can we define it to __memset() instead?
__memset() is supposed to be ignored by KASAN, e.g. KASAN runtime uses
it in the places where we don't care about bugs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists