lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:07:35 +0200 From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, LinuxKernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: License discripency in files,the words On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 04:11:45PM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: > Greg/Linus/Andrew, > > I am not sure how trivial it is , but if it is , please ignore it. > > I got this on Linus's tree : > > ~/git-linux/linux [master|✔] > 15:52 $ git grep "GPL-2.0-only" . | wc -l > 14734 > > And .. > > ~/git-linux/linux [master|✔] > 15:55 $ git grep "GPL-2.0" . | wc -l > 49530 > > > Well, aren't we out of uniformity??? Or is there any specific trace on > character? I don't know either. Please read LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 for the list of valid SPDX lines for that specific license. In short, both are fine, don't worry about it :) thanks, greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists