lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:26:59 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] gpio: dwapb: Read GPIO base from snps,gpio-base property

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:43 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> For backward compatibility with some legacy devices, introduce
> a new property snps,gpio-base to read GPIO base. Don't advertise
> to discourage users from utilizing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

I usually have a very negative gut reaction to any attempts to hardcode
the heavily deprecated use of the gpio_base for the global GPIO
numberspace. The reason is clear from drivers/gpio/TODO I think.

I need a really good explanation why this is needed, the only reason
people have been pushing this in the past is "oh we are using the
sysfs and we don't wanna change the GPIO numbers in our scripts"
which I really want to push back on now that we have the chardev and
the libgpiod utils.

If this is needed for something driver internal, it should stay in a
driver-local
variable.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists