linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode: Do not select FW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:01:38 +0000
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode: Do not select FW_LOADER

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 03:46:50PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:12:09PM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:16:09AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > 
> > > Also, I'm working on removing that homegrown get_builtin_firmware() and
> > > use the one in the fw loader:
> > > 
> > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200408094526.GC24663@zn.tnic
> > 
> > I would like to still encourage this, even with this patch in place,
> > as I think it makes this a proper call, and reflects better how the
> > firmware loader is used exactly.
> > 
> > FWIW, firmware loader will be changed soon to not be modular, and just
> > built-in or disabled.
> 
> I don't mind doing the work but Herbert has a point - there's no need to
> require a bunch of code for a trivial function.
> 
> What I could do in addition is move that trivial function into a
> fw-specific header and have it defined unconditionally so that the
> microcode loader can use it without needing the fw loader.

Would just have to see this part. But sounds like a better place than
today.

> The testcases stuff then goes ontop.

Sure!

  Luis