linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Remove redundant "be an" in the comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:49:20 +0000
From:   "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        philipp.reisner@...bit.com, lars.ellenberg@...bit.com,
        axboe@...nel.dk, bfields@...ldses.org, chuck.lever@...cle.com,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
        jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
        serge@...lyn.com, christian.brauner@...ntu.com
Cc:     slyfox@...too.org, ast@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
        josh@...htriplett.org, ravenexp@...il.com, chainsaw@...too.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Remove redundant "be an" in the comment

From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>

There exists redundant "be an" in the comment, remove it.

Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/kmod.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c
index 37c3c4b97b8e..3cd075ce2a1e 100644
--- a/kernel/kmod.c
+++ b/kernel/kmod.c
@@ -36,9 +36,8 @@
  *
  * If you need less than 50 threads would mean we're dealing with systems
  * smaller than 3200 pages. This assumes you are capable of having ~13M memory,
- * and this would only be an be an upper limit, after which the OOM killer
- * would take effect. Systems like these are very unlikely if modules are
- * enabled.
+ * and this would only be an upper limit, after which the OOM killer would take
+ * effect. Systems like these are very unlikely if modules are enabled.
  */
 #define MAX_KMOD_CONCURRENT 50
 static atomic_t kmod_concurrent_max = ATOMIC_INIT(MAX_KMOD_CONCURRENT);
-- 
2.26.2