linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Enable Greybus Audio codec driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:53:24 +0530
From:   Vaibhav Agarwal <vaibhav.sr@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        Mark Greer <mgreer@...malcreek.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Enable Greybus Audio codec driver

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 06:37:11PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:58:24PM +0530, Vaibhav Agarwal wrote:
> > The existing GB Audio codec driver is dependent on MSM8994 Audio driver.
> > During the development stage, this dependency was configured due to
> > various changes involved in MSM Audio driver to enable addtional codec
> > card and some of the changes proposed in mainline ASoC framework.
> 
> I'm not sure why you're copying me on a staging driver?  I don't recall
> the base driver having been submitted properly yet.

Hi Mark,

With patch#6 in this series, I'm proposing some of the (dummy) helper 
APIs required to link DAPM DAI widgets for the GB Audio modules 
added/removed dynamically.

Eventually, I would like to propose relevant changes in snd-soc APIs to 
enable dynamic linking of DAI widgets for the modules added and 
remove/free component controls for the module removed.

I'm seeking your opinion on the proposed changes. And as per the 
recommendation I'm sharing the changes with ASoC mailing list as well.

Kindly suggest me the preferred way to follow on this thread. 

--
Regards,
Vaibhav