linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] mm/hugetlb: use provided ac->gfp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:08:40 +0900
From:   Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-team@....com,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] mm/hugetlb: use provided ac->gfp_mask for allocation

2020년 6월 9일 (화) 오후 10:26, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>님이 작성:
>
> On Wed 27-05-20 15:44:55, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> >
> > gfp_mask handling on alloc_huge_page_(node|nodemask) is
> > slightly changed, from ASSIGN to OR. It's safe since caller of these
> > functions doesn't pass extra gfp_mask except htlb_alloc_mask().
> >
> > This is a preparation step for following patches.
>
> This patch on its own doesn't make much sense to me. Should it be folded
> in the patch which uses that?

Splitting this patch is requested by Roman. :)

Anyway, the next version would not have this patch since many thing will be
changed.

Thanks.