| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202006111622.01F596D@keescook>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:23:10 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
Robert Sesek <rsesek@...gle.com>,
Chris Palmer <palmer@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matt Denton <mpdenton@...gle.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] fs, net: Standardize on file_receive helper to
move fds across processes
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 10:39:23AM +0000, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:19:42AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 07:59:55PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 08:12:38AM +0000, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > > > As an aside, all of this junk should be dropped:
> > > > + ret = get_user(size, &uaddfd->size);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = copy_struct_from_user(&addfd, sizeof(addfd), uaddfd, size);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > >
> > > > and the size member of the seccomp_notif_addfd struct. I brought this up
> > > > off-list with Tycho that ioctls have the size of the struct embedded in them. We
> > > > should just use that. The ioctl definition is based on this[2]:
> > > > #define _IOC(dir,type,nr,size) \
> > > > (((dir) << _IOC_DIRSHIFT) | \
> > > > ((type) << _IOC_TYPESHIFT) | \
> > > > ((nr) << _IOC_NRSHIFT) | \
> > > > ((size) << _IOC_SIZESHIFT))
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We should just use copy_from_user for now. In the future, we can either
> > > > introduce new ioctl names for new structs, or extract the size dynamically from
> > > > the ioctl (and mask it out on the switch statement in seccomp_notify_ioctl.
> > >
> > > Yeah, that seems reasonable. Here's the diff for that part:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h b/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h
> > > index 7b6028b399d8..98bf19b4e086 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h
> > > @@ -118,7 +118,6 @@ struct seccomp_notif_resp {
> > >
> > > /**
> > > * struct seccomp_notif_addfd
> > > - * @size: The size of the seccomp_notif_addfd datastructure
> > > * @id: The ID of the seccomp notification
> > > * @flags: SECCOMP_ADDFD_FLAG_*
> > > * @srcfd: The local fd number
> > > @@ -126,7 +125,6 @@ struct seccomp_notif_resp {
> > > * @newfd_flags: The O_* flags the remote FD should have applied
> > > */
> > > struct seccomp_notif_addfd {
> > > - __u64 size;
> > > __u64 id;
> > > __u32 flags;
> > > __u32 srcfd;
> > > diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
> > > index 3c913f3b8451..00cbdad6c480 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/seccomp.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
> > > @@ -1297,14 +1297,9 @@ static long seccomp_notify_addfd(struct seccomp_filter *filter,
> > > struct seccomp_notif_addfd addfd;
> > > struct seccomp_knotif *knotif;
> > > struct seccomp_kaddfd kaddfd;
> > > - u64 size;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > - ret = get_user(size, &uaddfd->size);
> > > - if (ret)
> > > - return ret;
> > > -
> > > - ret = copy_struct_from_user(&addfd, sizeof(addfd), uaddfd, size);
> > > + ret = copy_from_user(&addfd, uaddfd, sizeof(addfd));
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > ----
> > > > +#define SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD SECCOMP_IOR(3, \
> > > > + struct seccomp_notif_addfd)
> > > >
> > > > Lastly, what I believe to be a small mistake, it should be SECCOMP_IOW, based on
> > > > the documentation in ioctl.h -- "_IOW means userland is writing and kernel is
> > > > reading."
> > >
> > > Oooooh. Yeah; good catch. Uhm, that means SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ID_VALID
> > > is wrong too, yes? Tycho, Christian, how disruptive would this be to
> > > fix? (Perhaps support both and deprecate the IOR version at some point
> > > in the future?)
> >
> > We have custom defines in our source code, i.e.
> > #define SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ID_VALID SECCOMP_IOR(2, __u64)
> > so ideally we'd have a SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ID_VALID_V2
> >
> > Does that sound ok?
> >
> > Christian
> Why not change the public API in seccomp.h to:
> #define SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ID_VALID SECCOMP_IOW(2, __u64)
>
> And then in seccomp.c:
> #define SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ID_VALID_OLD SECCOMP_IOR(2, __u64)
> static long seccomp_notify_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> unsigned long arg)
> {
> struct seccomp_filter *filter = file->private_data;
> void __user *buf = (void __user *)arg;
>
> switch (cmd) {
> case SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_RECV:
> return seccomp_notify_recv(filter, buf);
> case SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND:
> return seccomp_notify_send(filter, buf);
> case SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ID_VALID_OLD:
> pr_warn_once("Detected usage of legacy (incorrect) version of seccomp notifier notif_id_valid ioctl\n");
> case SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ID_VALID:
> return seccomp_notify_id_valid(filter, buf);
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> }
> ----
>
> So, both will work fine, and whenevery anyone recompiles, or picks up new
> headers, they will start calling the "right" one without a code change, and
> we wont break any userspace.
Yeah, that's what I'd prefer here.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists