[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f16717e0b275cc9a8970f62a7e46e7a97f8e5fa.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:32:06 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc: BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: ignore CamelCase for inttypes.h format
specifiers
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 23:01 -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> A few questions about changes below.
>
> On 2020-06-10 3:22 p.m., Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 14:48 -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> > > On 2020-06-10 2:09 p.m., Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 13:33 -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> > > > > Ignore CamelCase for inttypes.h for fixed integer types format specifiers.
> > > > > (ex. PRIx32 for uint32_t).
> > > > Personally, I don't like those.
> > > Checkpatch is run against a lot of code outside of the linux kernel but
> > > following linux coding style.
> > I know. I don't have any strong feeling about this either.
> >
> > But _this_ checkpatch is specifically for the linux-kernel.
> >
> > I just don't want to encourage a bunch of uses of these
> > somewhat useless defines internal to linux-kernel sources.
> >
> > > There is nothing personal about this, they are the format specifiers in
> > > inttypes.h for fixed width types .
> > True. It's impersonal to me too.
> >
> > > > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > []
> > > > > @@ -5157,6 +5157,8 @@ sub process {
> > > > > $var =~ /[A-Z][a-z]|[a-z][A-Z]/ &&
> > > > > #Ignore Page<foo> variants
> > > > > $var !~ /^(?:Clear|Set|TestClear|TestSet|)Page[A-Z]/ &&
> > > > > +#Ignore inttypes.h scanf/printf format specifiers for fixed size integer types
> > > > > + $var !~ /^(?:PRI|SCN)[dxoui](8|16|32|64|PTR|MAX)?$/ &&
> > There are missing format specifiers.
> > If this is done, the test should be against a variable
> >
> > Something like:
> >
> > our $inttype_format = qr{(?x:
> > (?:PRI|SCN)
> > [diouxX]
> > (?:FAST|LEAST)?
> > (?:8|16|32|64|MAX|PTR)
> > };
> I can try adding the "X" and FAST|LEAST.
> But I am not familiar enough with perl or the checkpatch script to
> understand
> what you mean by test should be against a variable vs what I have done.
> > btw: what about 24, 48, 96, 128 and 256?
> I can't find those values described for inttypes.h format specifiers.
There are others outside of linux.
http://cmod.gforge.inria.fr/doxygen/group__POSIX%E2%88%B7std%E2%88%B7inttypes%E2%88%B7__Snippet.html
> Where are you looking at those values from?
> > > > > #Ignore SI style variants like nS, mV and dB
> > > > > #(ie: max_uV, regulator_min_uA_show, RANGE_mA_VALUE)
> > > > > $var !~ /^(?:[a-z0-9_]*|[A-Z0-9_]*)?_?[a-z][A-Z](?:_[a-z0-9_]+|_[A-Z0-9_]+)?$/ &&
Like this:
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 524df88f9364..112ea055eba1 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -565,6 +565,14 @@ our $C90_int_types = qr{(?x:
(?:(?:un)?signed\s+)?int
)};
+# inttype.h formats
+our $inttype_formats = qr{(?x:
+ (?:PRI|SCN)
+ [diouxX]
+ (?:FAST|LEAST)?
+ (?:8|16|32|64|MAX|PTR)
+)};
+
our @typeListFile = ();
our @typeListWithAttr = (
@typeList,
@@ -5151,7 +5159,8 @@ sub process {
#(ie: max_uV, regulator_min_uA_show, RANGE_mA_VALUE)
$var !~ /^(?:[a-z0-9_]*|[A-Z0-9_]*)?_?[a-z][A-Z](?:_[a-z0-9_]+|_[A-Z0-9_]+)?$/ &&
#Ignore some three character SI units explicitly, like MiB and KHz
- $var !~ /^(?:[a-z_]*?)_?(?:[KMGT]iB|[KMGT]?Hz)(?:_[a-z_]+)?$/) {
+ $var !~ /^(?:[a-z_]*?)_?(?:[KMGT]iB|[KMGT]?Hz)(?:_[a-z_]+)?$/ &&
+ $var !~ /^$inttype_formats$/) {
while ($var =~ m{($Ident)}g) {
my $word = $1;
next if ($word !~ /[A-Z][a-z]|[a-z][A-Z]/);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists