linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Recommend denylist/allowlist instead of blacklist/whitelist

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d323a6a114690e4757c777befc997d60d82558f2.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:35:24 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        apw@...onical.com
Cc:     SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>, colin.king@...onical.com,
        sj38.park@...il.com, jslaby@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Recommend denylist/allowlist instead of
 blacklist/whitelist

On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 08:25 +0200, SeongJae Park wrote:
> From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> 
> This patchset 1) adds support of deprecated terms in the 'checkpatch.pl'
> and 2) set the 'blacklist' and 'whitelist' as deprecated with
> replacement suggestion of 'denylist' and 'allowlist', because the
> suggestions are incontrovertible, doesn't make people hurt, and more
> self-explanatory.

While the checkpatch implementation is better,
I'm still very "meh" about the whole concept.