linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Enable Greybus Audio codec driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:26:16 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Vaibhav Agarwal <vaibhav.sr@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        Mark Greer <mgreer@...malcreek.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Enable Greybus Audio codec driver

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 11:53:24PM +0530, Vaibhav Agarwal wrote:

> With patch#6 in this series, I'm proposing some of the (dummy) helper 
> APIs required to link DAPM DAI widgets for the GB Audio modules 
> added/removed dynamically.

> Eventually, I would like to propose relevant changes in snd-soc APIs to 
> enable dynamic linking of DAI widgets for the modules added and 
> remove/free component controls for the module removed.

> I'm seeking your opinion on the proposed changes. And as per the 
> recommendation I'm sharing the changes with ASoC mailing list as well.

These are proposed incremental changes to an out of tree driver that has
never been submitted.  I don't know what the current code looks like,
what it's supposed to be doing or anything like that so I've no idea
what's going on or why.

> Kindly suggest me the preferred way to follow on this thread. 

This is effectively out of tree code, until someone submits it properly
I'm not sure it's useful to submit incremental patches upstream.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)