[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a6354fd-90ec-914f-b5df-0c4c219bd26e@al2klimov.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:02:08 +0200
From: "Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@...klimov.de>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...a.pv.it>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@...el.com>,
Jacob Huisman <jacobhuisman@...nelthusiast.com>,
Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones:
Documentation/translations/it_IT
Am 11.06.20 um 12:40 schrieb Miguel Ojeda:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 9:02 AM Alexander A. Klimov
> <grandmaster@...klimov.de> wrote:
>>
>> Is any of you familiar with Golang?
>
> Don't worry about that! I'd expect seasoned C programmers to be able
> to read Go (or near languages) -- at least to have a general idea of
> what an algorithm does.
>
> It is not APL, after all :-)
Fine.
package main
import (
"bufio"
"bytes"
"context"
"errors"
"fmt"
fatomic "github.com/natefinch/atomic"
"golang.org/x/sync/semaphore"
"io"
"io/ioutil"
"net/http"
"os"
"os/exec"
"regexp"
"runtime"
"sync"
"sync/atomic"
"time"
)
var fileSemaphore = semaphore.NewWeighted(int64(runtime.NumCPU()) * 16)
var wg sync.WaitGroup
var processingFiles = struct {
sync.RWMutex
files map[string]struct{}
}{
files: map[string]struct{}{},
}
func main() {
cmd := exec.Command("git", "ls-files", "-sz")
cmd.Stderr = os.Stderr
out, errSP := cmd.StdoutPipe()
if errSP != nil {
fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr, errSP.Error())
os.Exit(1)
}
if errSt := cmd.Start(); errSt != nil {
fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr, errSt.Error())
os.Exit(1)
}
//go printProcessingFiles()
buf := bufio.NewReader(out)
for {
file, errRB := buf.ReadBytes(0)
if errRB != nil && errRB != io.EOF {
if errWt := cmd.Wait(); errWt != nil {
fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr, errWt.Error())
wg.Wait()
os.Exit(1)
}
fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr, errRB.Error())
wg.Wait()
os.Exit(1)
}
if bytes.HasPrefix(file, []byte{'1', '0', '0'}) {
if fields := bytes.SplitN(bytes.SplitN(file, []byte{0}, 2)[0],
[]byte{9}, 2); len(fields) == 2 {
_ = fileSemaphore.Acquire(context.Background(), 1)
wg.Add(1)
go processFile(string(fields[1]))
}
}
if errRB == io.EOF {
break
}
}
wg.Wait()
if errWt := cmd.Wait(); errWt != nil {
fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr, errWt.Error())
os.Exit(1)
}
}
/*
func printProcessingFiles() {
for {
time.Sleep(time.Second)
processingFiles.RLock()
fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr, processingFiles.files)
processingFiles.RUnlock()
}
}
*/
var httpLink = regexp.MustCompile(`\bhttp://[^# \t\r\n]*(?:\w|/)`)
var xmlns = regexp.MustCompile(`\bxmlns\b`)
func processFile(file string) error {
defer fileSemaphore.Release(1)
defer wg.Done()
processingFiles.Lock()
processingFiles.files[file] = struct{}{}
processingFiles.Unlock()
defer func() {
processingFiles.Lock()
delete(processingFiles.files, file)
processingFiles.Unlock()
}()
content, errRF := ioutil.ReadFile(file)
if errRF != nil {
return errRF
}
lines := bytes.Split(content, []byte{'\n'})
for i := range lines {
if !xmlns.Match(lines[i]) {
lines[i] = httpLink.ReplaceAllFunc(lines[i], processLink)
}
}
if modified := bytes.Join(lines, []byte{'\n'}); bytes.Compare(modified,
content) != 0 {
var buf bytes.Buffer
buf.Write(modified)
return fatomic.WriteFile(file, &buf)
}
return nil
}
type linkOk struct {
sync.Mutex
ok uint32
}
var links = map[string]*linkOk{}
var linksLock sync.RWMutex
var notsecure = http.Client{Timeout: 10 * time.Minute}
var secure = http.Client{Timeout: 10 * time.Minute, CheckRedirect:
httpsRedirect}
func processLink(link []byte) []byte {
linkStr := string(bytes.TrimPrefix(link, []byte("http://")))
linksLock.RLock()
lo, ok := links[linkStr]
linksLock.RUnlock()
if !ok {
linksLock.Lock()
lo, ok = links[linkStr]
if !ok {
lo = &linkOk{}
links[linkStr] = lo
}
linksLock.Unlock()
}
for {
switch atomic.LoadUint32(&lo.ok) {
case 0:
lo.Lock()
if atomic.LoadUint32(&lo.ok) == 0 {
if httpsAble(linkStr) {
atomic.StoreUint32(&lo.ok, 2)
} else {
atomic.StoreUint32(&lo.ok, 1)
}
}
lo.Unlock()
continue
case 2:
return bytes.Replace(link, []byte("http://"), []byte("https://"), 1)
default:
return link
}
}
}
func httpsAble(link string) bool {
resp, errGt := secure.Get("https://" + link)
if errGt != nil {
return false
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
if resp.StatusCode != 200 {
return false
}
resps, errGt := notsecure.Get("http://" + link)
if errGt != nil {
return false
}
defer resps.Body.Close()
if resps.StatusCode != 200 {
return false
}
var buf, bufs bytes.Buffer
if _, errCp := io.Copy(&buf, resp.Body); errCp != nil {
return false
}
if _, errCp := io.Copy(&bufs, resps.Body); errCp != nil {
return false
}
return bytes.Compare(buf.Bytes(), bufs.Bytes()) == 0
}
var insecure = errors.New("insecure")
func httpsRedirect(req *http.Request, _ []*http.Request) error {
switch req.URL.Scheme {
case "", "https":
return nil
}
return insecure
}
>
>>
>> @Maintainers Would any of you actually review like this? If yes, is the
>> pseudo-code not enough?
>
> Well, Kees already mentioned he would like to see it :-) As he said,
> it is usually the way for bulk patches to present the
> algorithm/semantic patch/etc. that was used.
>
> It is also useful to have it around so that it can be reused/reapplied
> later on, too.
If you're going to reproduce one of my patches for reviewing, checkout
torvalds/master and travel back to the latest commit before I submitted
the patch. Then run the algo.
>
>> I didn't log that link-by-link. Maybe because I also didn't follow plain
>> HTTP redirects while opening HTTPS links. Maybe it even matched, but was
>> added after I made the changes.
>
> It would be nice to have a list of links which cannot be converted,
> since nowadays they are likely to be the exception rather than the
> rule.
Don't worry, (by typing this words right now) I've noted this TODO of
mine (after this patch round).
>
>> * Linus *didn't even respond* (at least I didn't receive anything) to my
>> catch-them-all patch at all, not even like please not as .gz attachment
>> or please split by subsystem
>
> Please take into account that LKML volume is huge and Linus (like
> everybody else) only reads a small subset. Further, as a general rule,
I've addressed Linus directly (CC LKML) and explicitly asked like will
you have a look at this or not.
> Linus shouldn't be picking individual patches to begin with because
> that skips the review tree.
Who if not Linus shall review one huge patch spreading across lots of
subsystems?
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists