linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] EDAC/mc: call edac_inc_ue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFH1YnP_nreyKmHOa24d1XkrFECQg3yFjAJ04FJqWub__SjVxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:37:22 +0800
From:   Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...il.com>
To:     "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        mchehab@...nel.org, james.morse@....com, rrichter@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC/mc: call edac_inc_ue_error() before panic

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 1:19 AM Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 02:58:46PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> > By calling edac_inc_ue_error() before panic, we get a correct UE error
> > count for core dump analysis.
>
> Looks accurate, and I'll add the patch to be applied. But I wonder
> how big a problem it is. Isn't most of the information deriveable
> from the panic message?

Thanks for review.
Yes, it's totally not a problem.  I'm a little too strict here.

Zhenzhong