[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4646ed22573568c0953d272514ab3b701e54faa.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:22:52 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] .clang-format: update column limit
On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 13:54 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:36 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > Exactly. So don't set a new hard limit of 100.
> >
> > This would _always_ wrap lines to 100 columns when
> > 80 columns is still preferred.
>
> Why is 80 "still preferred" to begin with?
That's neither my nor your issue to solve.
It does though underline why this patch
should not be applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists