lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4646ed22573568c0953d272514ab3b701e54faa.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:22:52 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] .clang-format: update column limit

On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 13:54 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:36 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > Exactly.  So don't set a new hard limit of 100.
> > 
> > This would _always_ wrap lines to 100 columns when
> > 80 columns is still preferred.
> 
> Why is 80 "still preferred" to begin with?

That's neither my nor your issue to solve.

It does though underline why this patch
should not be applied.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ