[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2262ed0571ef9c2f24752189b55c965ce9c16d2f.1591898986.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:10:16 -0500
From: zanussi@...nel.org
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT 3/4] tasklet: Fix UP case for tasklet CHAINED state
From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
v4.19.127-rt55-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
-----------
commit 62d0a2a30cd0 (tasklet: Address a race resulting in
double-enqueue) addresses a problem that can result in a tasklet being
enqueued on two cpus at the same time by combining the RUN flag with a
new CHAINED flag, and relies on the combination to be present in order
to zero it out, which can never happen on (!SMP and !PREEMPT_RT_FULL)
because the RUN flag is SMP/PREEMPT_RT_FULL-only.
So make sure the above commit is only applied for the SMP ||
PREEMPT_RT_FULL case.
Fixes: 62d0a2a30cd0 ("tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue")
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Reported-by: Ramon Fried <rfried.dev@...il.com>
Tested-By: Ramon Fried <rfried.dev@...il.com>
---
kernel/softirq.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 73dae64bfc9c..9bad7a16dc61 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -947,10 +947,12 @@ static void __tasklet_schedule_common(struct tasklet_struct *t,
* is locked before adding it to the list.
*/
if (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL)
if (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_CHAINED, &t->state)) {
tasklet_unlock(t);
return;
}
+#endif
t->next = NULL;
*head->tail = t;
head->tail = &(t->next);
@@ -1044,7 +1046,11 @@ static void tasklet_action_common(struct softirq_action *a,
again:
t->func(t->data);
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL)
while (cmpxchg(&t->state, TASKLET_STATEF_RC, 0) != TASKLET_STATEF_RC) {
+#else
+ while (!tasklet_tryunlock(t)) {
+#endif
/*
* If it got disabled meanwhile, bail out:
*/
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists