[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3e43aaaafc014fc7564652798b61754d7e437ea.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:05:55 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
apw@...onical.com, SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>,
colin.king@...onical.com, sj38.park@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kristen.c.accardi@...el.com,
mishi@...ux.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Recommend denylist/allowlist instead of
blacklist/whitelist
On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 08:40 +0200, SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 03:43:32 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 10:32 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > On 11. 06. 20, 10:30, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > > > For example, as it seems at least you and I agree on the f-word to hug
> > > > replacement, we could add ``fuck||hug`` in the `deprecated_terms.txt` file to
> > > > avoid future spread of the f-words.
[]
> > $ git grep -i '\bfuck' | wc -l
> > 15
>
> I'm not understanding what you're meaning with this. Could I ask your
> explanation, please?
Just that there are 15 instances of that word in the kernel.
cheers, Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists