[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3a79f0442cb4930c633cf72145cfe95a45b9c78e.1591947428.git.shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 15:37:50 +0800
From: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
To: lars@...afoo.de, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, timur@...nel.org,
nicoleotsuka@...il.com, Xiubo.Lee@...il.com, festevam@...il.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] ASoC: fsl_asrc_dma: Reuse the dma channel if available in Back-End
The dma channel has been requested by Back-End cpu dai driver already.
If fsl_asrc_dma requests dma chan with same dma:tx symlink, then
there will be below warning with SDMA.
[ 48.174236] fsl-esai-dai 2024000.esai: Cannot create DMA dma:tx symlink
So if we can reuse the dma channel of Back-End, then the issue can be
fixed.
In order to get the dma channel which is already requested in Back-End.
we use the exported two functions (snd_soc_lookup_component_nolocked
and soc_component_to_pcm). If we can get the dma channel, then reuse it,
if can't, then request a new one.
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
---
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c
index d6a3fc5f87e5..d88e6343e0a2 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c
@@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ static int fsl_asrc_dma_hw_params(struct snd_soc_component *component,
struct snd_dmaengine_dai_dma_data *dma_params_be = NULL;
struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = substream->runtime;
struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair = runtime->private_data;
+ struct dma_chan *tmp_chan = NULL, *be_chan = NULL;
+ struct snd_soc_component *component_be = NULL;
struct fsl_asrc *asrc = pair->asrc;
struct dma_slave_config config_fe, config_be;
enum asrc_pair_index index = pair->index;
@@ -142,7 +144,6 @@ static int fsl_asrc_dma_hw_params(struct snd_soc_component *component,
int stream = substream->stream;
struct imx_dma_data *tmp_data;
struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm;
- struct dma_chan *tmp_chan;
struct device *dev_be;
u8 dir = tx ? OUT : IN;
dma_cap_mask_t mask;
@@ -197,18 +198,30 @@ static int fsl_asrc_dma_hw_params(struct snd_soc_component *component,
dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
dma_cap_set(DMA_CYCLIC, mask);
+ /*
+ * The Back-End device might have already requested a DMA channel,
+ * so try to reuse it first, and then request a new one upon NULL.
+ */
+ component_be = snd_soc_lookup_component_nolocked(dev_be, SND_DMAENGINE_PCM_DRV_NAME);
+ if (component_be) {
+ be_chan = soc_component_to_pcm(component_be)->chan[substream->stream];
+ tmp_chan = be_chan;
+ }
+ if (!tmp_chan)
+ tmp_chan = dma_request_slave_channel(dev_be, tx ? "tx" : "rx");
+
/*
* An EDMA DEV_TO_DEV channel is fixed and bound with DMA event of each
* peripheral, unlike SDMA channel that is allocated dynamically. So no
- * need to configure dma_request and dma_request2, but get dma_chan via
- * dma_request_slave_channel directly with dma name of Front-End device
+ * need to configure dma_request and dma_request2, but get dma_chan of
+ * Back-End device directly via dma_request_slave_channel.
*/
if (!asrc->use_edma) {
/* Get DMA request of Back-End */
- tmp_chan = dma_request_slave_channel(dev_be, tx ? "tx" : "rx");
tmp_data = tmp_chan->private;
pair->dma_data.dma_request = tmp_data->dma_request;
- dma_release_channel(tmp_chan);
+ if (!be_chan)
+ dma_release_channel(tmp_chan);
/* Get DMA request of Front-End */
tmp_chan = asrc->get_dma_channel(pair, dir);
@@ -221,6 +234,8 @@ static int fsl_asrc_dma_hw_params(struct snd_soc_component *component,
pair->dma_chan[dir] =
dma_request_channel(mask, filter, &pair->dma_data);
} else {
+ if (!be_chan)
+ dma_release_channel(tmp_chan);
pair->dma_chan[dir] =
asrc->get_dma_channel(pair, dir);
}
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists