[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200612102113.GA26056@pi3>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:21:13 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: Fix external abort on early interrupt
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:56:04AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:29:41AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:05:17AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 03:46:42PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > If interrupt comes early (could be triggered with CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ),
> > >
> > > That code is disabled since 2011 (6d83f94db95c ("genirq: Disable the
> > > SHIRQ_DEBUG call in request_threaded_irq for now"))? So, you had this
> > > without fake injection, I assume?
> >
> > No, I observed it only after enabling DEBUG_SHIRQ (to a kernel with
> > some debugging options already).
>
> Interesting. Maybe probe was deferred and you got the extra irq when
> deregistering?
Yes, good catch. The abort happens right after deferred probe exit. It
could be then different reason than I thought - the interrupt is freed
through devm infrastructure quite late. At this time, the clock might
be indeed disabled (error path of probe()).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists