lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:44:13 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: Fix external abort on early interrupt

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 12:34:47PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 6/12/20 12:31 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 12:21:13PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:56:04AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:29:41AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:05:17AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 03:46:42PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>>>> If interrupt comes early (could be triggered with CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ),
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That code is disabled since 2011 (6d83f94db95c ("genirq: Disable the
> >>>>> SHIRQ_DEBUG call in request_threaded_irq for now"))? So, you had this
> >>>>> without fake injection, I assume?
> >>>>
> >>>> No, I observed it only after enabling DEBUG_SHIRQ (to a kernel with
> >>>> some debugging options already).
> >>>
> >>> Interesting. Maybe probe was deferred and you got the extra irq when
> >>> deregistering?
> >>
> >> Yes, good catch. The abort happens right after deferred probe exit.  It
> >> could be then different reason than I thought - the interrupt is freed
> >> through devm infrastructure quite late.  At this time, the clock might
> >> be indeed disabled (error path of probe()).
> 
> From my point of view, the clocks are disabled as Oleksij pointed out, due to
> RUNTIME_PM at the end of probe():
> 
> > 	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&pdev->dev);
> > 	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);

These lines come from regular successful probe path, not deferred error path.

The clock is indeed disabled but not because of runtime PM, but:
clk_disable:
	clk_disable_unprepare(i2c_imx->clk);


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists