[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200612020755.50526-1-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:07:51 +0800
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org, josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, trivial@...nel.org
Cc: rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] rcu: trivial adjust for comments
During code reading, I found there are several mismatch between comments
and code implementation.
Adjust the comment for better understanding.
Wei Yang (4):
rcu: gp_max is protected by root rcu_node's lock
rcu: grplo/grphi just records CPU number
rcu: grpnum just records group number
rcu: use gp_seq instead of rcu_gp_seq for consistency
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.20.1 (Apple Git-117)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists