linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] fs, net: Standardize on file_receive helper to move fds across processes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202006120806.E770867EF@keescook>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jun 2020 08:13:25 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
Cc:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        "containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
        Robert Sesek <rsesek@...gle.com>,
        Chris Palmer <palmer@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matt Denton <mpdenton@...gle.com>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        "cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] fs, net: Standardize on file_receive helper to
 move fds across processes

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:46:30AM +0000, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> My suggest, written out (no idea if this code actually works), is as follows:
> 
> ioctl.h:
> /* This needs to be added */
> #define IOCDIR_MASK	(_IOC_DIRMASK << _IOC_DIRSHIFT)

This exists already:

#define _IOC_DIRMASK    ((1 << _IOC_DIRBITS)-1)

> 
> 
> seccomp.h:
> 
> struct struct seccomp_notif_addfd {
> 	__u64 fd;
> 	...
> }
> 
> /* or IOW? */
> #define SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD	SECCOMP_IOWR(3, struct seccomp_notif_addfd)
> 
> seccomp.c:
> static long seccomp_notify_addfd(struct seccomp_filter *filter,
> 				 struct seccomp_notif_addfd __user *uaddfd int size)
> {
> 	struct seccomp_notif_addfd addfd;
> 	int ret;
> 
> 	if (size < 32)
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 	if (size > PAGE_SIZE)
> 		return -E2BIG;

(Tanget: what was the reason for copy_struct_from_user() not including
the min/max check? I have a memory of Al objecting to having an
"internal" limit?)

> 
> 	ret = copy_struct_from_user(&addfd, sizeof(addfd), uaddfd, size);
> 	if (ret)
> 		return ret;
> 
> 	...
> }
> 
> /* Mask out size */
> #define SIZE_MASK(cmd)	(~IOCSIZE_MASK & cmd)
> 
> /* Mask out direction */
> #define DIR_MASK(cmd)	(~IOCDIR_MASK & cmd)
> 
> static long seccomp_notify_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> 				 unsigned long arg)
> {
> 	struct seccomp_filter *filter = file->private_data;
> 	void __user *buf = (void __user *)arg;
> 
> 	/* Fixed size ioctls. Can be converted later on? */
> 	switch (cmd) {
> 	case SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_RECV:
> 		return seccomp_notify_recv(filter, buf);
> 	case SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND:
> 		return seccomp_notify_send(filter, buf);
> 	case SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ID_VALID:
> 		return seccomp_notify_id_valid(filter, buf);
> 	}
> 
> 	/* Probably should make some nicer macros here */
> 	switch (SIZE_MASK(DIR_MASK(cmd))) {
> 	case SIZE_MASK(DIR_MASK(SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD)):

Ah yeah, I like this because of what you mention below: it's forward
compat too. (I'd just use the ioctl masks directly...)

	switch (cmd & ~(_IOC_SIZEMASK | _IOC_DIRMASK))

> 		return seccomp_notify_addfd(filter, buf, _IOC_SIZE(cmd));

I really like that this ends up having the same construction as a
standard EA syscall: the size is part of the syscall arguments.

> 	default:
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 	}
> }
> 
> --------
> 
> What boxes does this tick?
> * Forwards (and backwards) compatibility
> * Applies to existing commands
> * Command can be extended without requiring new ioctl to be defined

(Technically, a new one is always redefined, but it's automatic in that
the kernel needs to do nothing.)

> * It well accomodates the future where we want to have a kernel
>   helper copy the structures from userspace

Yeah, this is a good solution.

> The fact that the size of the argument struct, and the ioctl are defined in the 
> same header gives us the ability to "cheat", and for the argument size to be 
> included / embedded for free in the command passed to ioctl. In turn, this
> gives us two benefits. First, it means we don't have to copy from user twice,
> and can just do it all in one shot since the size is passed with the syscall
> arguments. Second, it means that the user does not have to do the following:
> 
> seccomp_notif_addfd addfd = {};
> addfd.size = sizeof(struct seccomp_notif_addfd)
> 
> Because sizeof(struct seccomp_notif_addfd) is embedded in 
> SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD based on the same headers they plucked the struct out of.

Cool. I will do more patch reworking! ;)

-- 
Kees Cook