[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202006121001.149B5D20C5@keescook>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:06:49 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@...wei.com>, paul@...l-moore.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, paulmck@...nel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com,
alex.huangjianhui@...wei.com, dylix.dailei@...wei.com,
chenzefeng2@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] cred: Add WARN to detect wrong use of get/put_cred
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 06:33:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 06:28:15PM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote:
> > Cred release and usage check code flow:
> > 1. put_cred()
> > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&(cred)->usage))
> > __put_cred(cred);
> >
> > 2. __put_cred()
> > BUG_ON(atomic_read(&cred->usage) != 0);
> > call_rcu(&cred->rcu, put_cred_rcu);
> >
> > 3. put_cred_rcu()
> > if (atomic_read(&cred->usage) != 0)
> > panic("CRED: put_cred_rcu() sees %p with usage %d\n",
> > cred, atomic_read(&cred->usage));
> > kmem_cache_free(cred_jar, cred);
> >
> > If panic is triggered on put_cred_rcu(), there are two possibilities
> > 1. Call get_cred() after __put_cred(), usage > 0
> > 2. Call put_cred() after __put_cred(), usage < 0
> > Since put_cred_rcu is an asynchronous behavior, it is no longer the first
> > scene when panic, there is no information about the murderer in the panic
> > call stack...
> >
> > So, add WARN() in get_cred()/put_cred(), and pray to catch the murderer
> > at the first scene.
>
> Why not not use refcount_t? It has all that goodness and more.
I thought these had been applied already, I guess not:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190306110549.7628-1-elena.reshetova@intel.com/
Can we try again?
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists