linux-kernel - Re: [RFC,net-next, 1/5] l3mdev: add infrastructure for table to VRF mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200612105148.1b977dc3@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:51:48 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>
Cc:     David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Shrijeet Mukherjee <shrijeet@...il.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Donald Sharp <sharpd@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Dinesh Dutt <didutt@...il.com>,
        Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@...roma2.it>,
        Paolo Lungaroni <paolo.lungaroni@...t.it>,
        Ahmed Abdelsalam <ahabdels@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC,net-next, 1/5] l3mdev: add infrastructure for table to VRF
 mapping

On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:49:33 +0200 Andrea Mayer wrote:
> Add infrastructure to l3mdev (the core code for Layer 3 master devices) in
> order to find out the corresponding VRF device for a given table id.
> Therefore, the l3mdev implementations:
>  - can register a callback that returns the device index of the l3mdev
>    associated with a given table id;
>  - can offer the lookup function (table to VRF device).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>

net/l3mdev/l3mdev.c:12:1: warning: symbol 'l3mdev_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please make sure it doesn't add errors with W=1 C=1 :)